What’s this “mutiny” business all about?  For starters there are numerous times that Senator John McCain stuck his finger in the eyes of conservatives who were simply upholding the U. S. Constitution.  Here are some of the major issues that they find troubling.

“Earmark” spending is a favorite whipping boy for McCain.  However, spending for the right purposes is perfectly acceptable, i.e., drilling for oil offshore and in ANWAR; building new, desperately needed oil refineries and nuclear power plants, which McCain opposes!   His boasting about spending is self-serving.
 
Taxes – he voted against both Bush tax cuts - if the argument is who will raise taxes less, McCain might “win”.
McCain-Feingold - a Constitutional disgrace.  It’s an incumbent politician’s dream.  There’s no way to put enough lipstick on that pig to disguise it – it solved nothing.  In fact, campaign funding bribes are worse than ever.  Any restriction on free speech (McCain-Feingold) in the political arena is never acceptable, and cannot be rationalized or justified.  Think about it – where does it end?  This precedent shattering law slams our constitutional right of free speech by mandating our silence in the 60 days preceding an election.  Read the Constitution.  You won’t find a 60 second restriction on free speech, much less one for 60 days!
McCain-Kennedy was nothing but an attempt to promote amnesty – read the bill.  Euphemisms like a “pathway to citizenship” are a lot of crap.  There is a pathway to citizenship that’s legal for anyone who wants to enter the country.  No thinking person is opposed to legal immigration - conservatives are opposed to ILLEGAL immigration.  Read the bloody bill.  Where would these people find $3,000 or $5,000 to pay what’s prescribed – how, with what, when, where? That’s the reason why it was dropped as soon as it was exposed for what it was – amnesty.  Apparently McCain had a recent epiphany and now says we have to “secure” the borders.  As a senator from a border state for +20 years, where the hell has he been?  And now we’re supposed to believe him? It would require the “willing suspension of disbelief” to believe him - thank you Hillary! 
Regarding McCain’s primary victories, part of that success can be attributed to Huckabee’s stunt in his NYTimes interview.  Remember his ”Don’t Mormons believe that Jesus and Satan were brothers?”  That’s all it took for fringe evangelical bigots to get stirred up and we began to hear about people who could never vote for a Mormon.  They turned out and voted against Romney - not for Huckabee.
.
The bottom line is that many conservatives cannot vote for someone who has demonstrated his lack of veracity and who seems to think it’s “his turn”.  Many  are willing to risk a couple of years of the crazy left in the White House, which will more than re-energize a currently dispirited conservative base that can be convinced to go to the polls again – as soon as there is a viable, principled candidate they can believe in and vote for.  Think back to the 1994 take over of congress and the “Contract With America” - after 2 short years of Bubba.
Reality Check - Country Club Republicans, the newly resurrected Rockefeller Republican wing of the Republican Party, have come out of the closet where they’ve been hiding for a couple of decades.  Led by the mainstream media, there’s a full court press to ensure that the leftwing is in a “win/win” position – so they’re supporting McCain…now.  You know who they are – the sacrifice anything in order to make a deal crowd.  Principles don’t matter.  The judiciary doesn’t matter.  The Constitution doesn’t matter.  What matters to them is doing the “deal” – any deal that advances a narrow agenda based on getting reelected.  They’ll not only dance with the devil, they’ll go to bed with him – and stay there.  Is that acceptable?  Not to principled conservatives.
The Country Club crowd still refuses to accept the fact that you can never sacrifice principle for expediency.  And you can’t sacrifice principle for convenience or short term political advantage, which is their primary objective. Their goal is personal power regardless of the cost to the country or the political process.  So why in the world should any conservatives support or vote for the candidate of choice of the leftwing media?  Go down the list, the NY Times, LA Times, Washington Post, Newsweek and Time magazines – the list is endless.  Does anyone believe they will endorse McCain in November, much less vote for him?  So while principled conservatives are lectured on the importance of being loyal, on supporting the candidate, on the resulting disaster if either Clinton or Obama takes over the White House, they’re supposed to suck it up and sacrifice principle for expediency         .  Don’t count on it.   In addition, it also raises the question, why settle for an imitation when you can have the real thing?  And that’s exactly what the leftwing media’s mantra will be in November.
Conservatives refuse to be treated by the Republicans as the Democrats treat their loyal black voters.   No thanks, we still remember the pre-Reagan era.
Could Conservatives support, work and vote for John McCain?  See Part 2.
And that’s a Reality Check.
*******
Contact Dan Calabria at www.realitychecktimes.com

Last Updated ( Apr 19, 2008 at 08:18 PM )